Least Distracting Typefaces – Is This the Plan?

Least Distracting Typefaces

In late September, 2012, an item reported by Automotive News stated that a group at MIT (the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) was doing a study on typefaces that would mitigate driver distraction. That is, typefaces that would be the least distracting.

Sure enough, a bit of additional exploration turned up work at the MIT Age Lab conducted along with the New England University Transportation Center and Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc. The exploratory study wanted to see if “certain type styles can reduce glance time — the time away from watching the road when driving while interacting with in-vehicle displays.” (see the press release here)

So, in a period of time when State legislatures are banning text messaging using cell phones because of the dangers, private companies – with a clear vested interest – and universities are studying how to reduce the time it takes to read text produced by in-car displays!

Is this really the best we can come up with? Has common sense left the building permanently alongside Elvis?

The press release linked above actually cites National Highway Transportation Safety Administration statistics stating that 26,000 crashes reported to police in 2010 “involved adjusting a device/control integral to the vehicle” and that “glances longer than two seconds are correlated with an increased crash/near-crash risk.”

Is There a Better Way?

While the intent of the research is laudable, wouldn’t it make more sense to remove text altogether? If a GPS system can give audible turn by turn directions, can’t text be shifted to spoken word? Glance time would drop to zero and maybe 26,000 crashes would be eliminated, not simply reduced.

Seriously, lets teach cars how to talk about itself, not just where the nearest pizza shop is.

——————————————————————-

Remember that only proper service and repair procedures will ensure the safe and reliable operation of your car. In addition, proper safety procedures and precautions, such as the  use of safety goggles, the right tools and the equipment should be followed at all times to eliminate the possibility of personal injury or improper service which could damage the vehicle or compromise its safety.

These posts are for information sharing purposes only, and should not be used in lieu of an OEM service manual or factory authorized service procedure. We are not in the auto repair business nor do we publish automotive service manuals. Nothing we include on these pages and posts has been reviewed, approved or authorized by any vehicle manufacturer.

Technology is always changing and what is current and accurate today may be literally out-of-date and inaccurate tomorrow. And when it comes to the current state of flux in the auto industry, nothing is more true.

Recent Posts

Launch control indicators

Launch control The symbols below are Launch Control Indicator symbols. They come courtesy of the…

20 hours ago

The Opel dashboard symbols page is now ordered by color

Opel dashboard symbols Our Opel dashboard symbols page has now been re-aligned by color. This…

2 days ago

Communication, Communication, Communication

Communication Communication issues continue to plague instrument panels. The instrument panel is the only interface…

3 days ago

To cabin heat an EV or not to cabin heat — in the cold

Cabin heat We've have seen several mentions to not use the cabin heater in an…

4 days ago

Our Ram dashboard symbols page is now re-ordered by color

Ram dashboard symbols Our Ram dashboard symbols page has now been re-ordered into the new…

5 days ago

Oversight causes us to correct the Chevrolet back up open page

Chevrolet back up open This is our fail! We updated both the Chevrolet back up…

5 days ago