We should have known — the automaker lied

The automaker lied

Early in August (2025), we put together a post that was essentially about who is liable if a self-driving car is involved in an accident. At the core of the piece was a very expensive settlement against Tesla. Now it turns out that the automaker lied about not having data from the incident.

See this from Autoweek.

We hadn’t considered this in our piece — a piece that concluded with the notion that if the car has control of the driving, the manufacturer has taken responsibility for the results.

We made the unfortunate assumption that data would be readily available after a crash. After all, a vehicle cannot drive itself without using a great deal of technology.

But the automaker, specifically Tesla in this case, lied about having data. The data, including video, was recovered rather handily by a hacker. Tesla then said it had had the data right along.

As far as we are concerned, this simply bolsters the case for assigning liability to the manufacturer first! What incentive is there to lie and hide evidence if they are the first responsible?

Should the driver be attentive? Yes. Should he or she share some responsibility? Again, yes. But any driver behind the wheel of a vehicle being controlled by software must be given a good deal of leeway.

So, again, if the car has control of the driving, the manufacturer has taken responsibility for the results. Period.

And now we can add that this should be codified to remove the incentive to lie. Missing data, legitimately or not? Double the award.

If a manufacturer, any manufacturer, is unwilling to be responsible, it should get out of the self driving game.

——————————————————————-

The material on these pages is provided for information sharing purposes only, and should not be used in lieu of an OEM service manual or factory authorized service procedure. We are not in the auto repair business nor do we publish automotive service manuals. Nothing we include on these pages and posts has been reviewed, approved or authorized by any vehicle manufacturer.

Remember that only proper service and repair procedures will ensure the safe and reliable operation of your car. In addition, proper safety procedures and precautions, such as the use of safety goggles, the right tools and the equipment should be followed at all times to eliminate the possibility of personal injury or improper service which could damage the vehicle or compromise its safety.

Technology is always changing and what is current and accurate today may be literally out-of-date and inaccurate tomorrow. And when it comes to the current state of flux in the auto industry, nothing is more true.

Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

BTS reports motor fuel prices were down in February

Motor fuel prices The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) opened March by reporting that monthly…

19 hours ago

Ford recalls nearly 2.36 million vehicles

Ford recalls Just in time for NHTSA's Vehicle Safety Recalls Week (March 2-8), Ford recalls…

2 days ago

Off road auxiliary lighting active indicator

Off road auxiliary lighting This is an Off Road Auxiliary Lighting Active Indicator symbol. It…

3 days ago

Tesla rear door back-up open issue prompts @NHTSA follow-up

Tesla rear door We've now sent a second letter to NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety…

4 days ago

Many changes found in Ford emergency start review

Ford emergency start A full review of Ford emergency start or back-up start procedures found…

5 days ago

Emergency steering indicators separated from collision warnings

Emergency steering indicators Our Collision Warning Indicators page had grown to be far too cumbersome…

6 days ago