IIHS study finds headlight glare factors little in crash data

Headlight glare

A few weeks ago, we cited a AAA article on headlight glare, noting that, despite what drivers actually think and experience, their own studies have not found a “problem”.

Now the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has added a study that seems to agree.

Their study investigated the prevalence and contributing factors of headlight glare crashes reported to in police across 11 U.S. states from 2015 to 2024. They wanted to know if glare is reported as a contributing factor in nighttime crashes and to identify conditions and populations most commonly associated with glare.

It seems that glare was reported in only 0.1%–0.2% of nighttime crashes, with little variation over time despite the widespread improvement in headlight visibility. In fact, most glare-related crashes occurred during daylight hours when the sun was close to the horizon.

Crashes at night with glare reported as a contributing factor were primarily associated with older drivers, older vehicles, and undivided low-speed roads.

They did add that the effect of headlight glare on crash risk could be reduced even further by technologies such as adaptive lighting and lane departure systems as well as improved lane markings. Or perhaps the European laser lighting systems represented to the right.

Previous research has demonstrated that improved headlight visibility reduces the risk of single vehicle nighttime crashes, which makes sense.

However, it sure seems like the majority of drivers are at least unhappy with the brightness of newer headlights in oncoming traffic. At the least, it’s good to know that attention is being paid the issue.

And there remains an online petition from the Soft Lights Foundation that asks Congress and federal agencies to properly regulate LEDs. You can sign it here.

The IIHS article can be found here.

——————————————————————-

The material on these pages is provided for information sharing purposes only and should not be used in lieu of an OEM service manual or factory authorized service procedure. We are not in the auto repair business, nor do we publish automotive service manuals. Nothing we include on these pages and posts has been reviewed, approved or authorized by any vehicle manufacturer.

Remember that only proper service and repair procedures will ensure the safe and reliable operation of your car. In addition, proper safety procedures and precautions, such as the use of safety goggles, the right tools and the equipment should be followed at all times to eliminate the possibility of personal injury or improper service which could damage the vehicle or compromise its safety.

Technology is always changing and what is current and accurate today may be literally out-of-date and inaccurate tomorrow. And when it comes to the current state of flux in the auto industry, nothing is more true.

Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

Niro EV range continues to surprise

Niro EV range A full charge was just completed and the Kia Niro EV range…

9 hours ago

Rivian jump start is a pain in the …

Rivian jump start Well, we didn't finish that sentence, but had to do it. As…

1 day ago

Rivian models added to our Get Out page

Get out page We have hosted a Get Out page for some 10 years since…

2 days ago

Infiniti symbols page doesn’t warrant a single change

Infiniti symbols page A full review of 2025 and 2026 models finds not a single…

3 days ago

Infiniti review finds no changes to back-up processes to open and start their vehicles

Back-up processes A full review of 2025 and 2026 Infiniti models finds no changes to…

4 days ago

Nissan symbols page gets but five new entries

Nissan symbols page A full review of 2025 and 2026 models resulted in the addition…

5 days ago