IIHS study finds headlight glare factors little in crash data

Headlight glare

A few weeks ago, we cited a AAA article on headlight glare, noting that, despite what drivers actually think and experience, their own studies have not found a “problem”.

Now the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has added a study that seems to agree.

Their study investigated the prevalence and contributing factors of headlight glare crashes reported to in police across 11 U.S. states from 2015 to 2024. They wanted to know if glare is reported as a contributing factor in nighttime crashes and to identify conditions and populations most commonly associated with glare.

It seems that glare was reported in only 0.1%–0.2% of nighttime crashes, with little variation over time despite the widespread improvement in headlight visibility. In fact, most glare-related crashes occurred during daylight hours when the sun was close to the horizon.

Crashes at night with glare reported as a contributing factor were primarily associated with older drivers, older vehicles, and undivided low-speed roads.

They did add that the effect of headlight glare on crash risk could be reduced even further by technologies such as adaptive lighting and lane departure systems as well as improved lane markings. Or perhaps the European laser lighting systems represented to the right.

Previous research has demonstrated that improved headlight visibility reduces the risk of single vehicle nighttime crashes, which makes sense.

However, it sure seems like the majority of drivers are at least unhappy with the brightness of newer headlights in oncoming traffic. At the least, it’s good to know that attention is being paid the issue.

And there remains an online petition from the Soft Lights Foundation that asks Congress and federal agencies to properly regulate LEDs. You can sign it here.

The IIHS article can be found here.

——————————————————————-

The material on these pages is provided for information sharing purposes only and should not be used in lieu of an OEM service manual or factory authorized service procedure. We are not in the auto repair business, nor do we publish automotive service manuals. Nothing we include on these pages and posts has been reviewed, approved or authorized by any vehicle manufacturer.

Remember that only proper service and repair procedures will ensure the safe and reliable operation of your car. In addition, proper safety procedures and precautions, such as the use of safety goggles, the right tools and the equipment should be followed at all times to eliminate the possibility of personal injury or improper service which could damage the vehicle or compromise its safety.

Technology is always changing and what is current and accurate today may be literally out-of-date and inaccurate tomorrow. And when it comes to the current state of flux in the auto industry, nothing is more true.

Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

Rivian R2 added to Emergency Escape page

Rivian R2. We have updated our Emergency Escape page with the processes necessary to manually…

1 day ago

Jaguar shows the new Type 01

Type 01. In August we noted that an attempt to update our Jaguar pages left…

4 days ago

Yes, the Roadster flies!

It flies... If you missed the Tesla Roadster rebirth, check it out here. The video…

5 days ago

Diesel price hits all time high

BTS report. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) released monthly motor fuels prices for September…

2 weeks ago

Two new videos added highlight the worst and the best interior emergency manual door overrides

Emergency manual door overrides. After posting about the good and the bad about interior emergency…

2 weeks ago

Green Car Journal hands out 2027 Green Car of the Year awards

Green cars. The Green Car Journal has handed out it 2027 Green Car of the…

3 weeks ago